Peer Review Policy

Abstract

This policy outlines the purpose, models, procedures, and ethical standards of peer review at The Journal of Human Police Policing Human (Pty) Ltd. Emphasising justice-centred, inclusive practices, the journal uses tailored review models—ranging from double-blind academic review to collaborative and community-focused assessments—depending on submission type. It defines expectations for reviewer conduct, conflict of interest, confidentiality, and respectful engagement. The policy affirms transparency, accessibility, and the transformation of traditional academic peer review through trauma-informed, culturally aware practices. Reviewers are supported through recognition and mentorship, reinforcing a scholarly ecosystem rooted in care, fairness, and accountability.

For transparency, this policy is reviewed annually by the editorial board and updated to reflect current international publishing standards.

This policy reflects evolving international best practices, including those outlined by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and the Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ). It is guided by principles of transparency, access, and care. These policies were developed specifically for The Journal of Human Police Policing Human (Pty) Ltd and are informed by a range of openly available publishing ethics resources and standards.